|

What Can We Do about
Terrorism? – Part I of III
The Ground Rules for Fighting
Terrorism
by Harry Browne
October 4, 2001
This 3-part series will propose the actions I believe our government
should take to fight terrorism.
Before looking at those proposals, however, we need to establish some
ground rules.
Perfection Isn't an Option
Rule #1: No solution is going to be perfect.
Our government has created ill will in many parts of the world. It has
bullied smaller countries, imposed new governments upon people who didn't
want them, and demanded that other governments do what our government
wants. It's unrealistic to think that there's anything that can be done
now to quickly undo all the ill will.
I have been criticized for dwelling on what our government has done
that led to the terrorist attacks. But if we don't understand what
provoked this, we can't evaluate any response to it —
and we can expect that the faulty policies will continue and provoke more
such attacks against Americans.
Foreign Policy Is the Issue
Rule #2: It is American foreign policy that has provoked the attacks,
not anything inherent in Muslim fundamentalism.
There are hundreds of millions of Muslims in the world who don't
believe in killing non-Muslims. In fact, Muslims have been killed in Arab
terrorist attacks, just as non-Muslims have.
In
an interview conducted by John Miller for Esquire in February
1999, Osama bin Laden said: "This is my message to the American
people: to look for a serious government that looks out for their
interests and does not attack others, their lands, or their honor. And my
word to American journalists is not to ask why we did that but ask what
their government has done that forced us to defend ourselves."
The fact that bin Laden uses bad means to achieve his ends doesn't
excuse our own government's mistakes; nor does it justify our government
doing the same things he does.
Bombing Doesn't Work
Rule #3: Bombing foreign countries doesn't end terrorism, it provokes
it.
Our government has bombed Libya, Iraq, the Sudan, and Afghanistan,
among other countries, supposedly to teach terrorists a lesson. But the
bombings haven't caused terrorists or foreign governments to change their
policies.
This Is a Crime, Not War
Rule #4: The terrorist attacks are a criminal matter, not a war.
War is by definition an armed conflict between governments. No
government has claimed responsibility for the September 11 attacks, and no
government has been so accused.
Calling the present situation a war is an excuse to impose wartime
policies against Americans and foreigners —
including violations of the Bill of Rights and killing foreign civilians.
Because the September attacks were a crime, the government's job is to
locate and bring to trial any perpetrators who didn't die in the attacks.
If some of them are located in foreign countries, our government should
request extradition — not threaten
to bomb the foreign country if we don't get our way.
If not all the criminals are found and brought to trial, it doesn't
mean that bombing innocent people would have brought the criminals to
justice.
Reverse Positions
Rule #5: If you think you or America is entitled to something, reverse
the positions and see how you'd react.
If Afghanistan doesn't turn bin Laden over to our government, ask
yourself whether you'd want your government to turn you over to the
Iranian government if it accused you of a crime.
If you don't think that American troops in almost a hundred foreign
countries are a source of resentment, ask yourself how you'd feel if
Chinese troops were stationed in your city.
If you believe America has a right to bomb foreign countries for the
actions of a few, ask yourself whether you'd want foreign governments to
bomb your city because of something Bill Clinton did. (Haven't we already
established that the terrorists were wrong to kill innocent civilians
because of their hatred for
American foreign policy?)
Government Is Incompetent
Rule #6: Government does not do anything well —
even those functions delegated to it by the Constitution.
The government has the constitutional authority to operate a Post
Office. But if it's urgent that a package get to the other side of America
by tomorrow morning, will you trust the constitutional Post Office or will
you use Federal Express?
Don't assume that just because the government has the legal authority
to do something that it will actually succeed. So be careful what you ask
for.
What Is the Object?
Rule #7: There's no way to eliminate all terrorism in the world.
Terrorists have existed since Biblical times. There will always be such
criminals — people who will kill
innocent bystanders to make a social or political statement, or to bring
pressure on a government to change its policies.
Saying that terrorism will be eradicated is not only unrealistic, it is
asinine. It indicates that the speaker shouldn't be trusted in anything
else he says.
What is realistic is the goal of reducing considerably
the threat of terrorism against the U.S.
In my next two articles, I'll present proposals for achieving this.
Part II
Part III
to Terrorist Series
Table of Contents
to Topical Index of
Articles
to Home Page
|