|

Harry Browne's Campaign Journal
April 2000
Saturday, April 1, 2000
Philadelphia
Today the Pennsylvania LP convention has a 90-minute panel for the
presidential candidates
Don Gorman, Barry Hess, and me. After I make my opening statement at the
podium, I move from the microphone back across the platform to my place
and I fall off the back of the narrow platform. I'm not hurt at all, but it
startles many people. When I get back on the platform I announce that I saw
Bob Dole do that in the 1996 campaign and wanted to try it for myself.
The Pennsylvania party has always been one of the LP's largest state
parties. Today there are a little over a hundred people in attendance at the
panel, and they are enthusiastic about the ideas expressed by the
candidates.
In the evening, Nadine Strossen of the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) gives an excellent speech at the banquet. Part of her talk focuses on
the way the Drug War has been used as an excuse to trash the Bill of Rights.
After her speech, Julian Heicklen, a chemistry professor at Penn State
University, gives a short speech
describing ads he has been running in local newspapers. He reads one of them
to the audience:
Greta Slovensky is 32 years old. She started to experience slurred
speech, body tremors, and distorted eyesight in 1990. Her motor skills were
impaired. She started drooling. Over the next two years, she stumbled and
fell often, had severe headaches, felt dizzy, and had trouble speaking.
Finally she was diagnosed with Wilson's Disease. By the time she was
treated, she could no longer talk, was informed that her vocal chords were
paralyzed, and put on a feeding tube. The drugs that she was given for
treatment were ineffective and had serious side effects. She had not been
able to talk for two years, when she started smoking cannabis. Her speech
returned after seven days, and her symptoms are improving. The tremors are
almost gone. Her walking is stabilized. The Republicrats want to take away
her medicine and put her in prison. Stop torturing the sick. Vote
Libertarian on November 2.
Needless to say, there wasn't a dry eye in the house.
Sunday, April 2, 2000
Philadelphia
I'm up at 5:15 to go into Philadelphia for a 7am radio show. A couple of
weeks ago I was on WIP with Peter Solomon by phone. Every time he took a
call from a listener, I was disconnected. So he has invited me to join him
in the studio while I'm in Philadelphia. The show goes well. The callers are
about evenly divided between supporters and critics. No matter how much I
hate to get up early in the morning, I don't have trouble with early shows.
After the show, Laura Carno and her husband, Bill Trees, take me to the
airport, to fly south to Nashville
by first going north to Detroit to change planes. I get home around 2pm, and
Pamela and I take the rest of the day and evening off to be together.
Except for one scheduled interview. At 5pm I'm on for an hour with Nathan
Lowe on WUSC at the University of South Carolina. There are no commercials
and no call-ins, just an hour of conversation. He is very sympathetic toward
libertarian positions, and I try to keep coming back to how various policies
will affect young people. I think the interview is a success, and Nathan
asks me to stay on for the next hour. However, as I don't know when Pamela
and I will have our next day off, I suggest that we instead do another
interview soon
which he quickly agrees to.
Monday, April 3, 2000
Nashville
My first event is a press interview with Miles Benson of the Newhouse
News Service. He is not particularly sympathetic, but I can hear his
keyboard clicking away with everything I say. I'm not pleased with the way
the interview is going. But towards the end I have occasion to say that a
Libertarian America will be much more harmonious than the contentious
society we have today. He asks why I think that. I say that, without
government imposing one way on everyone, gays will have less reason to fear
Christians and vice versa, the poor will have less animosity toward the rich
and vice versa, races will have less to fear from each other
and each of us will be free to decide the course of action he wants for
himself, rather than having to fight to prevent someone else's values from
prevailing. I ask whether I've made myself clear. He says, "Very!"
I hope he prints that.
I'm on for about 35 minutes with Bill Press, sitting in for Ronn Owens on
KGO, the big talk station in San Francisco. Press is a regular liberal
spokesman on CNN's CrossFire. This is my first encounter with him, and he's
generally a good interviewer. However, I just don't feel I'm getting my
points across in a persuasive way. The interview doesn't seem to be a bad
one, but I've certainly done a lot better. I always feel a bit disappointed
after such an interview, because I know every interview reaches many people
who have never heard me before
and this is their only basis on which to form an opinion.
But later I receive an e-mail from Rick Adams, saying: "I heard Mr.
Browne on the Ronn Owens show today and was quite pleased with his fresh
view on our country's problems. Real problems like ridiculous taxation laws
and imprisoning any American who doesn't agree with the government's view of
narcotic consumption. I can only hope more people are upset enough to REALLY
use their vote to voice our outrage at the way things are getting. It might
not happen right away but I will no longer throw my vote away on either head
of the beast. Keep up the good work! People are listening!" So you
never know.
Tuesday, April 4, 2000
Nashville
My interview with Scott Deacle of the Danville (Virginia) Register and
Bee (mentioned in the Campaign Journal for March 28) is published. He
provides a good overview of what we're for and how we hope to continue
growing and be far more visible this year.
Today's first interview is with Dark Starr on WCCO in Minneapolis. He's a
Republican, and he says he's concerned that Libertarians wouldn't do
anything to promote free enterprise. I never do figure out what he means by
that. He asks whether I would step aside for Alan Keyes, and I say no.
Although there is much to admire about Keyes, he isn't a Libertarian, he has
no proposals to reduce government, and we won't restore America as a free
country until we have a Libertarian President.
I have a phone interview with Steve Lund, a reporter for the Kenosha News
in Wisconsin. He is very friendly. He asks whether the thriving economy
makes it difficult to get people interested in a radical overhaul of the
system. I point out that heavy regulation caused the economy to slow down in
the 1970s and since then it hasn't really accelerated to a level comparable
to the 1950s and 1960s. The median family income (the income of a family
right in the middle of all American families) has barely grown over the past
30 years. I fax him some material from my forthcoming book.
The day's last interview is with the esteemed Gene Burns
long-time Libertarian, eloquent speaker and talk-show host. This show is on
WMEX in Boston, although Gene is broadcasting from San Francisco. Needless
to say, we get along just fine. There are a few phone calls, all helpful.
Wednesday, April 5, 2000
Nashville
A scheduled interview with Jim McCarthy of the Brunswick (Maine)
Times-Record is postponed to a later date. This allows me to sleep until
1:30pm. (I seem to mention sleep a lot, don't I?)
My first actual interview is an hour with Mike Richards on KPRC in
Houston. He's a "good ol' boy" type who obviously doesn't think
highly of government. We have an excellent conversation. Only two calls come
in but he asks many intelligent questions.
Near the end, in response to a question, I rhapsodize again on the
greater harmony that will exist in a Libertarian America: "Gays no
longer will fear Christians, and Christians will no longer fear Gays. Blacks
won't be so afraid of whites and whites won't be so afraid of blacks. Rich
and poor will no longer be so hostile to each other. This is because the
government will be so small that no one can use it to impose his values on
others. Today everyone's afraid some other group will get control of the
government and impose alien values. In a Libertarian America that can't
happen, and so people can relax and enjoy each other without fear." The
host says, "I really like that."
Then there's a phone interview with Jim Ragsdale of the St. Paul Pioneer
Press. It's scheduled for 20 minutes, but we talk for about 35. He's very
friendly, interested in libertarian ideas, and takes seriously my hope that
we'll be more visible this year.
The last interview is with Jerry Fogel on KPHN in Kansas City. It's
supposed to be for 25 minutes, but he holds me over for an extra 20 minutes.
He betrays none of his own philosophy, but he asks intelligent questions and
is quite respectful
saying that he wants me back for a longer interview.
Thursday, April 6, 2000
Nashville
Today's first interview is an hour with Roger Parent on WBET in Brockton,
Massachusetts. In introducing me he says, "I'm more libertarian than
anything." And later he says, "I agree with you 100%."
Needless to say, I get the opportunity to say anything I want.
Next is an interview with John Day of the Bangor (Maine) Daily News. It's
supposed to be 20 minutes, but I have to end the interview after 30 minutes
because of my schedule. Mr. Day is very interested, he has studied the
website, and wants to know how we hope to get attention. He says that
occasionally lightning strikes and someone like Jesse Ventura catches the
attention of the public. He finishes by wishing me good luck.
I then have a half-hour taped interview on the Florida Radio Network of
60 stations, to be played this weekend. The hosts are Reagan Smith and
former Republican Congressman Lou Frye. Before the taping starts, they
emphasize that the show is low key with no confrontations. They are very
nice to me in the interview. However, after the taping is complete, I'm off
the phone while they tape their closing comments
which may be more revealing of their feelings about libertarians.
Lastly, I'm on for five minutes with Joe Palan, a reporter on WMNN in
Minneapolis. He is very friendly and gives me a surprising amount of time to
voice my main concerns during the five minutes.
Friday, April 7, 2000
Nashville
I become aware of an article on the Nebraska.StatePaper.Com website, the
online version of some Nebraska newspaper. The article describes last Sunday's
Nebraska LP convention. It is amazingly respectful of the convention's
speakers
who are mostly Libertarian candidates.
One such candidate is John Graziano, running for Congress, who said
"the government safety net could turn into a shroud." The article
also mentioned that he "attacked school officials over reacting with
stiff penalties for kids bringing safety scissors or pen knives to class.
This is not zero tolerance,' he said. This is infinite absurdity.'"
I wish I'd been there. It sounds as though the Nebraska party is alive
and well.
There are no interviews today
giving me a chance to begin correcting the proofs and creating the Index for
my forthcoming book. I also can clean up my desk before heading out on the
road for most of the next two weeks.
Saturday, April 8, 2000
Portland, Maine
At 7:30am, I'm on the phone with Jeff Weinstein, broadcasting from
Lewiston on three Maine stations. He is a Libertarian, and is very
supportive on all counts. He says he was so impressed with our 30-minute
campaign videocassette that he has broadcast the audio portion on his show.
He jokes that the only bad part was when the host in the video said,
"Call the telephone number on your screen."
Later in the morning I'm at the airport, checking in for the flight to
Portland, Maine, via a connection in Detroit. My flight is going to be late
and it's obvious that I'll miss my connection in Detroit. So the Northwest
Airlines agent arranges for me to take a Delta flight to Portland through
Atlanta. At the Delta ticket counter, I try to get an exit row so I'll have
some legroom, but no exit seats are available. The Delta agent decides to
put me in first class instead, and I have the opportunity to relax, sleep,
and stretch my legs throughout the flight.
I arrive in Portland in time to speak at the evening banquet for the
Maine LP state convention. It is an enthusiastic audience of Maine
Libertarians and outsiders who have come to hear what Libertarians offer.
There are so many good people in the Maine LP, beginning with state chair
Mark Cenci, and their efforts are paying off.
Ben Barth introduces my speech. He says that seeing the Libertarian
national convention in 1996 caused him to change his life and become more of
a self-supporting, responsible citizen. He also tells about his daughter
Hannah, who represented me in 1996 in her middle-school class debate of
presidential candidates. She presented my message of personal freedom so
well that she got 61% of the vote. I am considering withdrawing from the
race this year and having her run instead.
My speech is well received. Afterward, Michael Cloud asks people to stand
if they are at their first Libertarian event, and well over half do so. He
asks some of them to tell the audience what they think of what they've
heard, and the responses are all enthusiastic.
When the banquet is over, Michael, Carla Howell (U.S. Senate candidate in
Massachusetts), and I drive to Boston, where I stay overnight.
Sunday, April 9, 2000
Minneapolis
In the morning, I fly to Minneapolis to be the noon banquet speaker at
the Minnesota LP state convention. The audience numbers around a hundred.
This is the third state convention I've attended here, and each time the
attendance seems to double each time. Charles Test and so many Minnesotans
have done an excellent job building the party.
The audience is very enthusiastic, and I'm hoping for good things there
this year.
Monday, April 10, 2000
Minneapolis & St. Paul
What a day. A full schedule of interviews. Matthew Gress, our Minnesota
Volunteer Coordinator, escorts me through the day.
It all begins at 8:30 with Ann Marie Ronning on WLTE-FM. We tape an
interview for broadcast either this weekend or the weekend after. Before
beginning, she explains that she almost never discusses politics on the show
but decided to make an exception in this case. The interview is supposed to
be a half-hour, but midway through she asks whether I can extend it to an
hour. She is intrigued by the Libertarian message, even though she doesn't
immediately accept it all. Once again, we are reaching an audience of
non-political people who probably haven't even been voting.
The problem is that there's no way to test how worthwhile it is to devote
resources to such an audience. Are these people responding favorably? And if
so, will they be enthusiastic enough to actually go to the polls in
November? Here again, we must be well-enough financed that we can reach them
through advertising again and again over the next seven months. Otherwise,
even if they remember me, they will come to feel that I don't have enough
support to warrant their bothering to vote for me.
Next comes a phone interview with Joe Hallett at the Columbus (Ohio) Post
Dispatch, the only non-Minnesota interview of the day. He is very friendly,
and the half-hour discussion focuses on the difficulty we face in breaking
through to national attention. I tell him there's no way to know when we'll
have the resources to reach enough people to break into the polls and have
an impact on the election, but that I hope it will happen this year.
Then another phone interview. This one is a short discussion with Steve
Murphy, a news announcer at WCCO in Minneapolis, who tapes some comments to
insert in the day's newscasts. Some of the soundbites concern the good
growth of the Minnesota LP.
I have an interview scheduled with an editorial page editor at the St.
Paul Pioneer Press. But when I arrive I find that it's with Steven Dornfield,
Glenda Crank Holste, and D. J. Tice, all editorial writers for the paper.
They quiz me more on campaign strategy than issues, but I manage to insert
the issues into my answers on strategy. Of course, I have no idea what they'll
write about me
if anything. One of them is impressed when I tell him I don't expect any
newspaper to go beyond a single courtesy interview until we're large enough
to affect the outcome of the election.
Now we go to KFAI-FM, an inner-city station for a taped interview with
Ahndi Fridell. The conversation goes wonderfully. She asks several questions
concerning poorer people
such as why they should care about the income tax or investing for their own
retirement. My answers are to the point and (I think) compelling. I mention
that the Social Security tax takes 15% from the first dollar a person earns
making it particularly difficult for someone to start getting his life
together. When she asks about corporations, I say I want to take away the
power of corporations to use government to impose their way on rich and poor
alike. When she asks about minorities, I point out that the prize of
government power makes groups afraid that others will get control and impose
their way
fostering distrust and making harmony and tolerance difficult.
The interview goes so well
and we have covered so many questions that I don't usually get asked
that I get her to promise to send me a tape we can put on our website.
From there, we head to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, only to discover
that a scheduled interview had been cancelled. But I get a message from the
campaign office that Al Malmberg of WCCO wants to do a quick interview. So
we head for WCCO and Al and I tape about ten minutes of conversation, to be
broadcast when today's baseball game ends. I've been on by phone with Al
several times and he's always been very good to me. It's a pleasure to meet
him in person.
The biggest event of the day is an hour on KSTP with Jason Lewis, the
city's biggest talk-show host. He's a libertarian Republican, and I've been
on with him before a couple of times. Ironically, I think this turns out to
be the weakest interview of the day, but it still is a good one. The
weakness (if I'm even correct about that) isn't Jason's fault; he is very
respectful and gives me plenty of opportunity to talk. Perhaps my reaction
stems from the other broadcast interviews going so well that this one seems
to be a slight letdown.
As we leave the studio, I get a call from the campaign office; Ahndi
Fridell called to say that something is wrong with the tape from our
interview and we have to redo it. Horrors! This was the one interview I
wanted most to preserve. We drive back to KFAI and redo the interview. She
uses the same list of questions as before, and my answers seem (to me)
articulate and compelling. But somehow the follow-up questions don't take us
into the same new areas where I felt so brilliant before. She says she still
hopes someone will rescue the material on the earlier digital tape, and will
send it to me if that happens.
As though to put the icing on a particularly productive day, I see an
article by Melissa Levy in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, reporting on my
speech yesterday at the state convention. The headline is, "The less
government, the better, Libertarian says." Wonder of wonders, the
entire article (15 paragraphs) relates the main points of my speech,
starting with, "If Harry Browne were elected President, the Libertarian
Party candidate said one of the first things he'd do is order a box of pens
to veto bills from Congress." It goes on from there to talk about my
principal issues, other parties wanting to run your life, pardoning
non-violent drug offenders, pointing out how much better off you'd be
without the income tax, and so on. Easily the best press coverage so far in
the campaign.
Tuesday, April 11, 2000
Nashville
Upon returning home from Minnesota, I have one interview
with Chris Casteel of the Daily Oklahoman in Oklahoma City. He is very
friendly and respectful. As with most reporters, he's more interested in our
campaign strategy than with the issues, and I have to try to keep slipping
the issues into my answers to strategy questions.
When he asks how we expect to do better than we did in 1996, I point out
that the party is 2-1/2 times as large as four years ago, we are in a
position to spend many times as much on advertising, and we expect to be far
more visible. The big question is: will we be visible enough that most
eligible voters will become aware that there's an alternative to the two
candidates who want to make government larger
that there's a Libertarian candidate who wants to repeal the income tax,
free you from Social Security, and end the insane War on Drugs?
Wednesday, April 12, 2000
Nashville
No interviews today, as I get my first day off in a couple of weeks.
Pamela and I run some errands, eat out, and rent a couple of videos to
watch. But before going to sleep, I slip into my office and check my email.
Thursday, April 13, 2000
Nashville & Boston
I have one interview before catching a plane to Boston. It is 35 minutes
with Doug Guetzloe on WWNZ in Orlando, Florida. He describes himself as a
libertarian Republican, and it's obvious that he has "libertarian
tendencies." He also has invited two local county LP chairmen to join
the conversation near the end. (Unfortunately, I couldn't hear their names.)
One caller asks whether the Libertarian Party is comprised mostly of
former Republicans. I respond that there is no statistical evidence on this,
but that my own informal experience indicates that we seem to draw about
equally from Republicans, Democrats, and people who haven't been voting at
all. Many people I meet in the party tell me they didn't vote for many years
until they encountered the Libertarians. I also am receiving a good deal of
email from people who say they intend to vote for the first time this year
because they've heard about our campaign.
Like so many interviewers, the host asks me what I think about the Elian
Gonzales case. I tell him that the obvious policy should be to grant
political asylum to the boy's father, if he wants it and is free to accept
it. But I point out the hypocrisy of Democrats and Republicans saying the
boy shouldn't be sent back to Cuba, when our government since 1995 has been
intercepting Cuban refugees at sea and forcibly returning them to Cuba
with the full support of Democratic and Republican politicians. Just put a
child on TV and every politician's posture changes overnight. Too bad we can't
see all the people in Cuban prisons who were put there, in effect, by the
U.S. Coast Guard.
Friday, April 14, 2000
Boston
What a day planned for today. Between our P.R. firm Newman
Communications, Press Secretary Jim Babka, and Elaine Berchin of the
Massachusetts LP, I have ten interviews scheduled.
It all begins at the leisurely hour of 5:30am with The Morning
Show on WRKO, with Andy Mose and former Republican Congressman Peter
Blute. I do this show by phone from my hotel room. Andy is a comedian and
asks me the key issue question: "Which Darren did you prefer on the old
Bewitched TV show?" I say I have to waffle on that one because I couldn't
tell them apart. But the 25-minute interview contains a lot of substance
discussions on taxes, abortion, immigration, and more. And Andy really comes
to life when I mention ending Drug Prohibition
an issue on which he apparently agrees with me.
Muni Savyon picks me up at the hotel and escorts me for the morning. We're
joined by John Moran of Newman Communications, our P.R. firm. We begin at
WZLX-FM with Ann Cody, taping a 20-minute interview that will be broadcast
Sunday on a public affairs show. She is very friendly and respectful, and
gives me the opportunity the make all the points that are important to me.
Next we head for WBUR at Boston University for an interview with Bruce
Gellerman. The place is teeming with police and Secret Service personnel. I
say, "I didn't order this protection." But, of course, it isn't
for me; it's for President Clinton's trade representative (whose name I can't
spell or pronounce) who the President thinks is threatened by people
protesting the World Trade Organization. My interview is taped and lasts
about 10 minutes. The host is skeptical of my positions, but provides a very
nice, respectful introduction.
At the Boston Globe, I am interviewed by Bob Turner, who is the Chief
Editorial Writer, and Don MacGillis, also an editorial writer. They are very
nice to me, ask a lot of questions, and seem genuinely interested in what I
have to say. They know I have an uphill battle and they are quite
sympathetic. The general impression I come away with is that they take me
very seriously.
On the way out of the building, Bob Turner takes me by the office of Jeff
Jacoby, the conservative-libertarian syndicated columnist. I've read and
enjoyed many of his articles. He says he had intended to sit in on the
interview, but was prevented by a looming deadline. He asks that I let him
know before my next trip to Boston, so that he can follow me around for the
day and do an article on my campaigning.
We head next to the Boston Herald, where Libertarian entrepreneur Bob
Willis joins us. We have lunch in the Herald cafeteria. Muni heads back to
his own work and Bob takes over as my escort.
At the Herald, I'm interviewed by editorial writer Wayne Woodlief and
conservative syndicated columnist Don Feder. The latter has been critical of
libertarians at times
apparently he considers them a threat to Republican chances and he also
genuinely opposes the degree of liberty libertarians want. He tells me that
he read How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World many years ago. I ask
him what he thought of it. He says he liked it
then. I promise to send him a copy of the newer edition. Feder also invites
me to come back in the future for a longer discussion on the differences
between conservatives and libertarians.
(Woodlief's article appears the following Sunday, and it's mostly about
Pat Buchanan. The part about me is pretty condescending.)
The Herald recently published a very helpful article about Carla Howell,
the Libertarian candidate running against Teddy Kennedy. In fact, she has
received a wealth of good publicity and is being taken very seriously by the
press. It's even possible that the Republican candidate won't obtain
sufficient signatures to get on the ballot by the deadline in May.
We call the Boston Phoenix, a local weekly newspaper, to postpone our
interview there
as we're running too far behind. It isn't unusual for the interviews to last
longer than scheduled, and we're now in the position that we couldn't make
it to the Phoenix and still be on time for the next radio show.
That show is with Jay Severin, broadcasting on WTKK from The Rack
a combination restaurant and pool hall next to the legendary Faneuil Hall,
where patriots spoke in the 18th century and I was fortunate to be able to
speak in 1996. It turns out that Severin is an avowed libertarian who rarely
has guests, but who has invited me on to clear up for his listeners what a
libertarian is. Apparently, many of his callers have said they were
libertarians and others have shown interest. There's an audience of about 20
of the restaurant's patrons gathered around the stage where Jay and I are
"performing." It's obvious that this is definitely not a political
show. On the whole it goes well, but I notice that the setting and the noise
throw me a little off balance and my words don't come out as fluently as in
most interviews.
From there we go to WTKK, where PBS is videotaping me for a documentary
on third parties that will air in October. Strangely, the host, Darren
Garrick, asks me questions about what I hope will happen between now and
election day
even though when the show airs, such things will no longer be hopes; they'll
already be confirmed as achievements or disappointments. But we get all that
worked out.
He focuses largely on the troubles a third party must face trying to
break through the stranglehold the Republicans and Democrats have on the
electoral process. Despite his determination to concentrate on the strategy
and mechanics of the campaign, I continually recite that we're the only
party offering to free you to live your life as you see fit (and related
points), so I'll be amazed if the final cut doesn't include some of our
message.
He asks if we will succeed. I tell him I can't predict the future, but
that it seems to me very possible that we'll elect a Libertarian President
by 2008.
Bob Willis, Dave Rizzo, and I have dinner and talk about the challenge
facing Dave in his race for state representative. We have a little more time
than expected, because my appearance on New England Cable News has been
preempted by coverage of the Elian Gonzales case.
The final show of the day is with David Brudnoy on WBZ. David is one of
New England's most popular talk-show hosts. He's an old friend; my first
interview with him may have been as much as 20 years ago. He has had AIDS
for a number of years, and when he found that out he vowed to beat it. This
evening I'm happy to see that he looks healthier than he did when I saw him
four years ago. He is a strong, amazing individual.
David begins the interview by telling his audience that he voted for me
in 1996 and will do so again this year. When one caller says I'm not yet the
Libertarian nominee, David assures him that I will be and that he's going to
vote for me. In response to another caller, he says he flirted with the idea
that change would more likely come from within one of the two old parties
but that he realized how impossible that would be
and he's sticking with the Libertarians. I also said a few important things
something about liberty, I think.
Saturday, April 15, 2000
Boston
Today is the Massachusetts LP's state convention. The party is certainly
in great shape. Elias Israel is doing a wonderful job as State Chair,
assisted by people like Elaine Berchin, who has established excellent
relations with the media, Muni Savyon, who has been recruiting candidates,
Dave Rizzo, Bob Willis, and many, many other determined people.
There are several press people in attendance. And I have two interviews
before speaking. The first is with Thomas Grillo of the Boston Globe. He is
very friendly and wishes me luck at the end of the interview.
The second is with Curt Lovelace, publisher of the Massachusetts News, a
conservative monthly. He asks a number of questions about campaigning. He
also asks why conservatives should vote for me instead of George W. Bush. I
say that economic conservatives have to prove to the Republican Party that
they won't any longer vote for candidates who are going to make government
bigger
that they can't change the Republican Party for the better if they continue
to endorse whoever the party runs. I then say that social conservatives
should be scared to death of Bush's proposals. He wants to use their money
to subsidize private, "faith-based" charities
which will effectively render them useless, just as federal aid to private
colleges has made them virtually indistinguishable from state universities.
And Bush wants to subvert private elementary schools with federal vouchers
which will tie up the schools in government regulations until they become
clones of the government schools, ending "choice" rather than
enhancing it.
Lovelace says he has all he needs and asks whether there's anything else
I'd like to say. I ask whether he'll be around for my speech and he says no;
so I say, in effect, let's talk about your freedom. We talk for another 15
minutes and he takes another few pages of notes as I pour it on about the
way we want to give you control over your life and set you free.
Carla Howell, the U.S. Senate candidate, speaks shortly before I do. She
delivers a stirring stump speech. Afterward, she does an excellent job of
answering questions
possibly the best job I've ever seen anyone do. It makes me wonder why I can't
answer questions so concisely.
Jim Sullivan is the convention emcee, and he provides a very flattering
introduction for me. It is as energizing for me as for the audience to give
a speech in this setting. To see 150-200 good-looking, enthusiastic people
here reminds me that we have the talent, the skills, and the determination
to bring about liberty in our lifetimes.
After the speech, Carla and I go to the press room to do separate
interviews with Bub Hokanson on WTAG. Again, she does an excellent job of
answering questions. I follow her on the show, providing a 1-2 punch, so to
speak. The host is very respectful, saying that
in effect
we're simply trying to restore the traditional American idea of personal
freedom. And yet, he is careful not to appear to be a partisan of
libertarians.
Sunday, April 16, 2000
Denver
I'm up at 5:45 to catch an early plane to Denver, to attend the Colorado
LP convention. Tim Sauer and Michelle Konieczny pick me up at the Denver
airport
the giant boondoggle airport that very few people in Colorado wanted; it's
so far away from Denver that it seems as though it's in Illinois. Tim and
Michelle are doing terrific jobs as the Colorado Campaign Coordinator and
the Adams County Campaign Coordinator, respectively.
Shortly after my arrival, I speak at the Colorado LP convention. There
are a hundred people or so in attendance. I mention that I may be the most
optimistic person in the Libertarian Party
that I was recently diagnosed as having Chronic Euphoria with Pollyanna
Syndrome. But because of the power of our message
the desire to give people control over their own lives
I believe we have an excellent chance to reverse the long-term trend toward
bigger government, and do it in this decade.
Monday, April 17, 2000
Denver
Today I have six scheduled interviews plus a meeting.
I wake up at 6:30 for a 5-minute phone interview, only to be told that
the interview is postponed until tomorrow, as interest in the stock market
has preempted me.
At 8:15, BetteRose Smith, the Colorado LP Chair, picks me up to take me
to today's media events. The first is with Gary Tessler at KWAB. It is meant
to be 20 minutes, but it lasts for about 40 minutes. We get along very well.
He is a liberal and disagrees with a lot of what I say (except for my stand
on the Drug War), but he gives me plenty of opportunity to state my views.
I was scheduled to meet with Sue O'Brien of the Denver Post editorial
board, and then have a phone interview with Jeff Miller on the Morning Call
radio show. But both have been cancelled and will have to be rescheduled.
Normally, about one interview in ten gets cancelled. But today it is three
out of six, and last Friday two out of ten interviews were cancelled.
At noon, I meet with Ari Armstrong, Dudley Brown, Bob Glass, and Mark
Call
all of whom are Colorado gun-rights activists. They are supportive of my
campaign, and we discuss ways to reach the tens of thousands of gun
supporters in Colorado, and to convince them that voting Republican in
November will lead to more compromises of their gun rights.
After lunch, I have an interview with Linda Seebach at the Rocky Mountain
News, one of Denver's two daily newspapers. She is very friendly and very
familiar with libertarian ideas and the Libertarian Party. In fact, when the
Drug War comes up, she mentions that it's one of the very few issues on
which she doesn't agree with Libertarians. I don't know whether she's
planning to write an article about me now, or just wants to know what's
happening with the campaign. However, she says she will want to do a column
on our FEC protest if we decide to go ahead with that. The interview lasts
an hour and 15 minutes.
The final interview is with Jim Bryan at KNUS. He is a staunch
Republican. On the way to the interview, we hear him doing a phone interview
with Jim Nicholson, the Republican National Chairman. With the Columbine
anniversary this week, Nicholson echoes the NRA line that there should be no
new gun legislation; instead, the Clinton administration should do a better
job of enforcing the 20,000 gun laws on the books.
During my hour on the show, I remind the host of what Nicholson said and
ask him whether he thinks those 20,000 laws are all good laws. He says no,
and has to agree that the Republican/NRA strategy doesn't make much sense.
(I also thank him for having Nicholson as my warm-up act.)
Bryan is very complimentary of my handling of the issues, and he says I
would make a good Republican. I tell him that I have almost nothing in
common with Republican politicians. The Republicans want to keep Social
Security going; I want to free you from it. The Republicans want to
rearrange the tax burden; I want to reduce your tax burden dramatically. The
Republicans want to manage health care better; I want to get the government
completely out of it. The Republicans want to take over private schools (by
managing them through vouchers) and "faith-based" organizations
(by giving them welfare money); I want to get the federal government
completely out of education and welfare. The Republicans like to make
government bigger and bigger, and run your life better; I want to get
government out of your life and let you run it yourself.
As with so many conservative Republican talk-show hosts, he says he
agrees with 90% of what I say, but not on the Drug War. And, like so many
hosts, he says we Libertarians would be more successful if we'd drop that
issue. I point out that we couldn't be believed if we pointed out that the
government that makes such a mess in so many areas is somehow going to
succeed in stamping out drugs. And, while our stand on drugs was relatively
unpopular five years ago, the tide has been turning rapidly in our
direction.
At the conclusion of the show, Jim Bryan invites me back for a two-hour
interview, so we can discuss the issues in more depth.
Despite the cancellations, the day's events have been very helpful.
Tuesday, April 18, 2000
Denver
The day begins at 6:35 with the phone interview that was postponed from
yesterday. It is with April Zesbaugh and Kim Kobel on a news broadcast on
KOA in Denver. It is meant to be only five minutes, but it lasts about ten.
They give me plenty of opportunity to talk, and at the end of the interview
one of them says something to the effect of, "There it is folks; this
year you'll have a third choice instead of just the same old Democrats and
Republicans." Ah, but I neglected to mention the website and phone
number.
Later in the morning I catch a flight to Nashville and Home Sweet Home.
Pamela and our dog Schnoodle meet me at the airport. (He is named Schnoodle
because, when we got him from the Humane Society, he appeared to be a cross
between a Schnauzer and a Poodle; but we later discovered he's a Portuguese
Water Dog, a rare breed.)
In the evening, I do a phone interview on KABC with my friend Larry
Elder, the popular Los Angeles radio host. We talk about the press release
we sent out this week on the Microsoft case
in which I accepted Assistant Attorney General Joel Klein's bravura
challenge to debate any "libertarian" on the question of whether
the anti-trust suit will help competition. We also go over many other issues
and,
as always, there's one caller who is certain that government is the answer
to every question
and who won't consider any other possibility.
Wednesday, April 19, 2000
Nashville
My first interview is at 10am with John Duane and Chris Kelly at KIDO in
Boise, Idaho. During the 45-minute discussion, John says that Libertarian
items are very intriguing, and in fact he confesses that he voted for me in
1996
to which Chris says that she too voted for me. Two of the callers bring up
the wasted vote issue. One says he's voted Republican in the past, "But
if you keep on talking as you are, I'll vote Libertarian." Another
keeps saying it does no good if you don't win. I try to point out that he
isn't winning either, since the people he votes for don't give him what he
wants, but it doesn't win him over
at least not today.
Then I'm on for an hour with Glenn Mitchell at KERA-FM, the NPR station
in Dallas. He provides a very nice introduction, giving an accurate summary
of libertarian ideas. Throughout the conversation, he is non-committal, very
calm and pleasant
and so are all the callers. Some of them support me, others are opposed, but
all are polite and none are hostile. Glenn's demeanor must rub off on his
listeners.
To one caller who says it's a pipe dream to think that churches and other
agencies will help those in need, I say it's a pipe dream to think that
government agencies are providing much help. But more important, "I
want you to have control over your own life. I want you to be in a position
to be able to help anyone you think is in need. And if you don't want to
help anyone, that's okay, too. You don't need to feel guilty
your taxes aren't really providing much help either."
My next interview is an hour with Jim Dexter, the LP chair of Utah. He
has his own talk show on KTKK in Salt Lake City. Most of the callers want me
to change my views on something
oppose free trade or support a national sales tax. However, an elderly,
disabled woman calls who says she is getting by on very little. She says she
supports what I'm doing because she wants her children and grandchildren to
live in a freer country than she has. I mention that this demonstrates that
we shouldn't write off people who pay no taxes or who are getting government
services
and especially not the elderly. Most of them would be delighted to see their
children and grandchildren go through life without the awful tax burden they've
had to face.
Then it's a few minutes on the phone with Kelly Beaucar of
ConservativeHQ.com. she's already written about me at least twice, but now
wants my opinion on the controversy over the Republican Congress' desire to
appoint Bradley Smith to the Federal Election Commission. Smith supports
doing away with campaign contribution and spending limits (although he wants
to retain reporting). She says that some of the Democrats have been
comparing him to Slobodan Milosevic or David Duke. I say that this is
typical when someone in government has such enormous power: the stakes are
so high that people will go to any lengths to make sure that power is
controlled by a political ally. The answer, of course, is to take that power
away from the politicians. She includes some of my quotes in the article
that appears the following day.
Thursday, April 20, 2000
Nashville
In the evening I appear on the David Gold show on KGNW in Dallas. It is a
taping, to be aired tomorrow night
and Russ Verney, former Executive Director of the Reform Party, is also a
guest. The relationship between Verney and me is cordial, and we each point
out that the parties have cooperated frequently to strike down ballot-access
hurdles and on other procedural problems.
It is, as sometimes happens, an interview in which several of the topics
don't lend themselves to clear-cut libertarian positions
in this case, the Elian Gonzales matter and the South Carolina Confederate
flag issue. In the latter case, I point out that this is an issue typical of
politicians in which everyone gets riled up over something that is merely
symbolic. It isn't going to change anyone's life significantly whether the
flag stays up or is taken down, whether or not the Ten Commandments are
posted in government schools, whether or not there's a flag-burning
amendment. But politicians seize on these issues because it gives them a way
of playing to their constituents without actually doing anything for them.
Friday, April 21, 2000
Nashville
My only interview today is with Michael Dresser on KFAR, the ABC radio
station in Fairbanks, Alaska. My impression is that Michael and his
listeners are very conservative Republicans. Today I feel very articulate
and very intense. I really pour it on regarding what the politicians are
doing to you and the country.
Michael asks whether I believe that Clinton's ability to flout the law
and get away with it has set a bad precedent for the future. I say that the
precedents were set long before Clinton
with Presidents violating the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights,
and getting away with it. I cite the example of Clinton being able to bomb
The Sudan and Afghanistan at his own whim, since Ronald Reagan was able to
do so when he bombed Libya and invaded Grenada. We have reached the point
that politicians can do anything they want, since there is no longer an
enforceable Constitution to restrain them.
Over and over in the conversation, I come back to the point that only a
strong-willed President
someone determined to restore liberty to America
will stand up to Congress and the Supreme Court. A President whose sole
purpose is to reduce government to its constitutional functions can do so
much to change the course of history. But we won't get that kind of
President with Al Gore, George W. Bush, or Pat Buchanan.
Only when we have a Libertarian President will the debate change from how
fast government should grow
to how fast and how far government should be reduced.
Every one of the half-dozen callers is positive and supportive.
Monday, April 24, 2000
Nashville
Good news! Today the Portland Oregonian
releases a state-wide poll,
showing the following preferences among Oregon voters:
George W. Bush,
Republican, 40%
Albert J. Gore, Democrat, 27%
Ralph Nader, Green, 7%
Harry Browne, Libertarian, 2%
Patrick Buchanan, Reform, 2%
This is good news on two counts. First, a polling company is including us
in the question posed
something that didn't happen in 1996 unless we commissioned the poll.
Second, we're already showing up in the results, and in a state where I've
had almost no localized coverage at all
no press interviews and just one radio interview on a Portland station.
Votes for me had to come from some combination of (1) national coverage
of the campaign (national TV appearances like Fox News TV or national radio
shows), (2) the work of our volunteer organization, and (3) growing positive
name recognition for the word Libertarian.
And then another piece of good news. The Zogby poll
releases the
results of an April 20 national presidential poll. I'm included for the first time:
Bush, Republican, 42.5%
Gore, Democrat, 36.0%
Buchanan, Reform, 4.4%
Nader, Green, 4.0%
Browne, Libertarian, 0.8%
Hagelin, Natural Law, 0.2%
No answer, 12.1%
The third parties combined receive 9.4% of the 87.9% who had a
preference. This is larger than the margin of difference between Bush and
Gore. That should encourage the polling companies to continue listing the
main third-party candidates, as their votes may have an impact on the
outcome of the election.
My first interview today is for an hour starting at 9am with Michael
Graham on WSC in Charleston, South Carolina. Not surprisingly, he wants my
opinion on the Gonzales kidnapping. I say the kidnapping may have been a
good thing, because it showed people the naked power of the government, but
without anyone getting hurt physically. There is no question that the
kidnapping was unconstitutional, unwarranted, and not even in keeping with
the current court order.
Immediately afterward I'm on for an hour with Robby Noel on the American
Freedom Network
a handful of stations around the country. Again, the Gonzales case. But we
also cover the Drug War and several other issues. It sounds as though his
audience is made up of right-wing, conspiracy-oriented populists. But it
seems that everything I say sets well with the host, and all the callers are
supportive. It's easy to handle the question of possible conspiracies just
by pointing out that reducing government is the answer
taking the power away from those who want to use it to enslave you. At the
conclusion of the interview, the producer asks me to arrange for another
interview on the show.
Tuesday, April 25, 2000
Nashville
I have one interview today. It is with Jeff Miller, the Washington
correspondent for the Allentown (PA) Morning Call. He is very friendly, and
admits he doesn't know much about Libertarians. We talk for 30-40 minutes.
He says he thinks every candidate should be heard, but he appreciates the
fact that I don't demand that the press cover us when we might not have an
impact on the outcome of the election.
He asks whether there aren't some things a nation's people should do
collectively
such as the programs by which Roosevelt pulled us out of the depression. I
point out that the country was still in poor shape going into World War II,
and the idea that the New Deal rescued America from the depression is a
convenient myth of history.
More important, I mention that the idea of a nation's people acting
collectively really means the politicians are deciding how all of us are
supposed to act. Why is it necessary to force people to go along with a
policy or program they don't approve of? I want to return control of your
life to you, not to some mythical "collective"
which really means to whomever has the most political influence.
Wednesday, April 26, 2000
Nashville
I receive some emails asking why I haven't spoken out on the Elian
Gonzales kidnapping.
This is the not the kind of issue on which we're likely to get much
publicity, because right now so many people are saying so many things. We
would be lost in the babble of voices. The best kind of issue is one wherein
we are standing alone while other political parties issue mild statements or
ignore the issue entirely
while the average person is affected directly and he knows it. The intrusive
census forms were a good example of that; the LP generated a good deal of
positive publicity by standing up for privacy.
We aren't issuing regular press releases now. However, shortly we will
begin a steady stream of press releases, op-ed articles, and talking points
for letters to editors to be distributed to our volunteers.
Thursday, April 27, 2000
Nashville
Only one interview today. It is an hour in the evening with Stan Solomon,
broadcasting from WZL in Indianapolis, with coverage on several satellite
stations, short wave, and the Internet. I was on once with him in the last
campaign and once in 1998. He is very supportive of my positions, but he
worries that a Libertarian vote will get Al Gore elected and perpetuate what
he believes is the most immoral administration in history.
I point out that the Clinton administration has been good for freedom in
one respect: the use of raw power has been very visible
with incidents like Waco and the Gonzales kidnapping. DEA agents were
busting down the doors during the Reagan and Bush administrations, but that
went largely unnoticed. Clinton has helped many people realize that
government is brute force.
I'm feeling very articulate this evening. It makes me wish I'd had
several interviews. But then I always want more. Just call me Oliver Twist.
Friday, April 28, 2000
Charleston, South Carolina
I fly to Charleston for the South Carolina LP convention. However, my
flight is delayed and I arrive in Charleston just a little while before time
to speak. Waiting for me is Schuyler R. Kropf, a reporter with the
Charleston Post and Courier. We have a 15-minute conversation
mostly about the difficulties of running as a third-party candidate.
Don Gorman and I each give 20-minute speeches, followed by a joint
question period. Toward the end of that, a gentleman in the audience rises
to note that, in almost an hour, neither of us has had anything negative to
say about the other. Don points out that all the presidential candidates
pledged during the California debate in February that we would emphasize the
positive
what we want to achieve, not what one's opponents have done wrong.
Saturday, April 29, 2000 - Yonkers, New York
I arise at 5am (ugh!) to catch a plane to LaGuardia airport. I check into
a hotel by the airport, and later catch a taxi to the New York LP convention
in Yonkers. (The hotel in Yonkers was sold out at the time the reservation
was made.)
I arrive in time to hear an excellent speech by Steve Landsburg, a
columnist for Slate.com (Microsoft's online magazine). He explains that
children learn to follow rules in playing with each other that are
diametrically opposite to the subsidies, special privileges, and force that
adults employ through government.
I'm surprised to find that Reginald Jones is there to speak. He is one of
many new friends I acquired during the last campaign. He is a radio
personality who also gives speeches at colleges and other venues around the
country. Being a black man, his speech "Freedom is the Answer to
Racism" carries special weight. He relates the history of the
entrepreneurial endeavors of blacks in the South Bronx, and goes on to point
out how government has kept blacks from using their own talents and skills
to climb up the economic ladder
effectively making them dependent on government handouts. And he notes how
reluctant the black "leaders" are to come to the aid of any black
individual or group who is held back by government. Afterward, Steve Dasbach
tells me that he's arranged for Reginald to speak at the national convention
in June. Look for his speech; you'll enjoy it.
During the banquet I give my speech, and I'm followed by John Clifton,
the Libertarian candidate running against Rudolf Giuliani and Hillary
Clinton.
Sunday, April 30, 2000
New York
Curses! My wake-up call doesn't come through, and I've set the clock
radio incorrectly. I've missed my plane to Cincinnati, and thus my
connection to Nashville. I hurry over to the airport, only to discover that
the Cincinnati flight is just leaving
two hours late. But I will have missed my Nashville connection, so Delta
reschedules me through Atlanta.
I finally arrive home, about three hours late, and Pamela and I take the
rest of the day off.
Previous
Installment Next
Installment
Campaign
Report Table of Contents |